Addict (drugaddict) wrote,

The Most Right-Wing Postwar Govenment in the UK

Subject: George Monbiot: "The Most Right-Wing Postwar Govenment in the UK" (GUARDIAN)
To: Undisclosed-Recipient

TO: Distinguished Recipients
FM: John Whitbeck
Transmitted below is a forthright critique of the Americanization of the United Kingdom, by George Monbiot in the GUARDIAN.
Among other subjects, Monbiot addresses the desirability of applying the Nuremberg Principles to Tony Blair -- and, at least by implication, to other notorious war criminals still on the loose on the other side of the Atlantic -- a cause dear to the hearts of everyone who genuinely respects the concept of the rule of law.

The Most Right-Wing Postwar Government in the UK

George Monbiot

The Guardian

May 20, 2008


You can hear the wringing of hands and tearing of cloth all the way down Farringdon Road. Dismayed by the local election results, convinced that Labour will be crushed in Thursday's by-election, afraid that this will presage disaster in the next general election, my fellow columnists are predicting the end of the civilized world. But I can't understand why we should care.


Yes, I worry about what the Tories might do if they get in. I also worry about what Labour might do if it wins another term. Why should anyone on the left seek the re-election of the most right-wing government Britain has had since World War II?


New Labour's apologists keep reminding us of the redistributive policies it has introduced: Sure, starting children's centers, reductions in child poverty, raising the school leaving age, the national minimum wage, flexible hours for parents and carers, better conditions for part-time workers, the decent homes program, free museums, more foreign aid. All these are real achievements and deserve to be celebrated.


But the catalog of failures, backsliding and outright destruction is much longer and more consequential.


One fact alone should disqualify this government from office: We have a Cabinet of war criminals. The Nuremberg tribunal characterized a war of aggression as "the supreme international crime". It is not just that Britain's Labour government launched and sustained an unprovoked war, it also sabotaged all means of achieving a peaceful resolution. In April 2002, it helped the Bush administration to sack José Bustani, the head of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, in order to prevent him settling the dispute over Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction. In two separate offers before the invasion, Saddam Hussein agreed to meet the terms the US and Britain were demanding. But they slapped him down and concealed his offers from their electorates.


Cluster bombs can be legally used because the British government helped to block an international ban in 2006: it is still holding out against an outright ban at the current talks in Dublin. The government has undermined another international peace agreement — the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty — by deciding to renew the Trident missile program. It was the first administration to announce a policy of pre-emptive nuclear attack: even the great nuclear enthusiast Harold Macmillan never went this far. In 2007, the defense secretary, without parliamentary debate, revealed that the US would be allowed to use the listening station at Menwith Hill for its missile defense system.


Labour appears to be prepared to meet any demand the Bush administration makes, however outrageous. In 2003 the government signed a one-sided extradition treaty, permitting the US to extract our citizens without producing prima facie evidence of an offense. In the same year the defense secretary announced that he would restructure the British armed forces to make them "inter-operable" with those of the United States, ensuring for the first time in British history that they became functionally subordinate to those of another sovereign power.


Labour's foreign policy is as unethical as Margaret Thatcher's. It provides military aid to the government of Colombia, whose troops are involved in a campaign of terror against the civilian population. It granted an open license for weapons exports to the government of Uzbekistan, and sacked the British ambassador when he tried to draw attention to the regime's human rights abuses. It has collaborated with the US program of extrajudicial kidnapping and imprisonment, left our citizens to languish in Guantanamo Bay, and made use of Pakistani torture chambers in seeking to extract testimony from British suspects. Until 2005 it tied its foreign aid program to the privatization of public utilities in some of the world's poorest countries. Last year it held out against reform of the International Monetary Fund's unfair allocation of votes.


The proportion of the British population in prison has risen by a fifth since the Tories left office. Today Britain locks up 151 out of every 100,000 people. The Chinese judiciary, by contrast, which is notorious for its willingness to bang up anyone and everyone, jails 119 people per 100,000; Burma imprisons 120. The Serious Organized Crime and Police Act, passed in 2005, contains clauses that permit the police to ban any demonstration, however peaceful. It is one of a long series of bills the Labour government has passed that restrict the right to protest.


The citizen has been re-regulated; business has been deregulated. Last year deaths caused by serious injuries at work rose by 11 percent: a predictable result of the sacking of 1,000 staff at the Health & Safety Executive and a 24 percent reduction in workplace inspections.


Labour has shifted taxation from the rich to the poor, cutting corporation tax from 33 percent to 28 percent and capital gains tax from 40 percent to 18 percent, and introducing a new entrepreneurs' relief scheme, taxing the first million of capital gains at just 10 percent. It tried to raise the income tax paid by the poorest earners from 10 percent to 20 percent. Labour has lifted the inheritance tax threshold from £300,000 to £700,000, and maintained the cap on the highest rates of council tax.


While vigorously prosecuting benefits cheats, it has allowed tax avoidance, mostly by the very rich, to reach an estimated £41billion. Inequality today is slightly worse than it was when Labour took power in 1997.


Above all, the Labour government has destroyed hope. It has put into practice Thatcher's dictum that "there is no alternative" to a market fundamentalism that subordinates human welfare to the demands of business. Labour has created a political monoculture that kills voters' enthusiasm, and has delayed electoral reforms that would have given smaller parties an opportunity to be heard. All we are left with is fear: the fear that this awful government might be replaced by something slightly worse.


Fear has destroyed the Labour party, but people keep supporting it in trepidation of letting the other side win.


Save this government? I would sooner give money to the Malarial Mosquito Conservation Project. Of all the causes leftist thinkers might support, New Labour must be the least deserving.

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.