Noam Chomsky: Why is Iraq Missing From 2008 Presidential Race?
In a major address, Noam Chomsky says there has been little change in the conventional debate over a U.S. invasion abroad: from Vietnam to Iraq, the two main political parties and political pundits differ only on the tactics of U.S. goals, which are assumed to be legitimate. On the other hand, public opposition to war has also remained consistent, Chomsky says, but whether Iraqi or American—ignored.Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton will face off tonight in their final debate before the crucial primaries in Ohio and Texas next week. Over the past few days, the two Democratic candidates have traded barbs over trade, foreign and domestic policies as the rhetoric from both campaigns heats up. Since the presidential race began well over a year ago, Iraq has been one of many topics of debate. However, the war has not been the central issue of the campaign as it was in the midterm elections in 2006 and there are still more than 160,000 US troops deployed in Iraq.
Why is this the case? That was the subject of a recent talk by Noam Chomsky. A professor of linguistics at MIT for over half a century, Chomsky is the author of dozens of books on US foreign policy. His most recent is called “Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy.” We spend the rest of the hour with Noam Chomsky. He recently spoke before a packed audience in Arlington, Massachussetts at an event sponsored by Bikes Not Bombs.
Noam Chomsky, Professor of linguistics at MIT for over half a century, Chomsky is the author of dozens of books on US foreign policy. His most recent is called “Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy.”