Addict (drugaddict) wrote,
Addict
drugaddict

Wolfowitz's girlfriend problem

http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2007/04/19/wolfowitz/print.html



*To print this page, select "Print" from the File menu of your browser*

------------------------------
------------------------------------------


   Wolfowitz's girlfriend problem

*Not only did the World Bank president find his companion Shaha Ali Riza
a cushy job in the State Department, but she received a security
clearance -- unprecedented for a foreign national.*

*By Sidney Blumenthal*

Apr. 19, 2007 | Paul Wolfowitz's tenure as president of the World Bank
has turned into yet another case study of neoconservative government in
action. It bears resemblance to the military planning for the invasion
of Iraq, during which Wolfowitz, as deputy secretary of defense,
arrogantly humiliated Army chief of staff Eric Shinseki for suggesting
that the U.S. force level was inadequate. It has similarities to the
twisting of intelligence used to justify the war, in which Wolfowitz
oversaw the construction of a parallel operation within the Pentagon,
the Office of Special Plans, to shunt disinformation directly to the
White House, without its being vetted by CIA analysts, about Saddam
Hussein's alleged ties to al-Qaida and his weapons of mass destruction,
and sought to fire Mohamed ElBaradei, director of the United Nations'
<http://dir.salon.com/topics/united_nations/> International Atomic
Energy Agency, for factually reporting before the invasion that Saddam
had not revived his nuclear weapons program. Wolfowitz's regime also
uncannily looks like the occupation of Iraq run by the Coalition
Provisional Authority, from which Wolfowitz blackballed State Department
professionals -- instead staffing it with inexperienced ideologues --
and to whom Wolfowitz sent daily orders.

Wolfowitz's World Bank <http://dir.salon.com/topics/world_bank/> scandal
over his girlfriend reveals many of the same qualities that created the
wreckage he left in his wake in Iraq: grandiosity, cronyism,
self-dealing and lying -- followed by an energetic campaign to deflect
accountability. As with the war, he has retreated behind his fervent
profession of good intentions to excuse himself. The ginning up of the
conservative propaganda mill that once disseminated Wolfowitz's
disinformation on WMD to defend him as the innocent victim of a
political smear only underlines his tried-and-true methods of operation.
The hollowness of his defense echoes in the thunderous absurdity of
Monday's Wall Street Journal editorial:
<http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009948> "Paul
Wolfowitz, meet the Duke lacrosse team."

Superficially, Wolfowitz's arrangement for his girlfriend of a job with
a hefty increase in pay in violation of the ethics clauses of his
contract and without informing the World Bank board might seem like an
all-too-familiar story of a man seeking special favors for a romantic
partner. Wolfowitz has tried to cast the scandal as a "painful personal
dilemma," as he described it in an April 12 e-mail to outraged employees
of the World Bank, who have taken to calling the neoconservative's
girlfriend his "neoconcubine." He was, he says, just attempting to
"navigate in uncharted waters." But the fall of Wolfowitz is the final
act of a long drama -- and love or even self-love may not be the whole
subject.

Wolfowitz's girlfriend, Shaha Ali Riza, is a Libyan, raised in Saudi
Arabia, <http://dir.salon.com/topics/saudi_arabia/> educated at Oxford,
who now has British citizenship. She is divorced; he is separated. Their
discreet relationship became a problem only when he ascended to the
World Bank presidency. Riza had floated through the neoconservative
network -- working at the Free Iraq Foundation in the early 1990s and
the National Endowment for Democracy -- until landing a position in the
Middle East and African department of the World Bank. The ethics
provisions of Wolfowitz's contract, however, stipulated that he could
not maintain a sexual relationship with anyone over whom he had
supervisory authority, even indirectly.

Back in 2003, Wolfowitz had taken care of Riza by directing his trusted
Pentagon deputy, Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith -- who had been
in charge of the Office of Special Plans and had been Wolfowitz's
partner in managing the CPA -- to arrange for a military contract for
her from Science Applications International Corp. When the contract was
exposed this week, SAIC issued a statement that it "had no role in the
selection of the personnel." In other words, the firm with hundreds of
millions in contracts at stake had been ordered to hire Riza.

Riza was unhappy about leaving the sinecure at the World Bank. But in
2006 Wolfowitz made a series of calls to his friends that landed her a
job at a new think tank called Foundation for the Future that is funded
by the State Department. She was the sole employee, at least in the
beginning. The World Bank continued to pay her salary, which was raised
by $60,000 to $193,590 annually, more than the $183,500 paid to
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and all of it tax-free. Moreover,
Wolfowitz got the State Department to agree that the ratings of her
performance would automatically be "outstanding." Wolfowitz insisted on
these terms himself and then misled the World Bank board about what he
had done.

Exactly how this deal was made and with whom remains something of a
mystery. The person who did work with Riza in her new position was
Elizabeth Cheney, then the deputy assistant secretary of state for Near
Eastern affairs. And Riza's assignment fell under the purview of Karen
Hughes, undersecretary of state for public diplomacy. But these facts
raise more questions than they answer.

The documents released by the World Bank do not include any of the
communications with the State Department. How did Elizabeth Cheney come
to be involved? Did Wolfowitz speak with Vice President Dick Cheney, for
whom he had been a deputy when Cheney was secretary of defense in the
elder Bush's administration?

Riza, who is not a U.S. citizen, had to receive a security clearance in
order to work at the State Department. Who intervened? It is not unusual
to have British or French midlevel officers at the department on
exchange programs, but they receive security clearances based on the
clearances they already have with their host governments. Granting a
foreign national who is detailed from an international organization a
security clearance, however, is extraordinary, even unprecedented. So
how could this clearance have been granted?

State Department officials familiar with the details of this matter
confirmed to me that Shaha Ali Riza was detailed to the State Department
and had unescorted access while working for Elizabeth Cheney. Access to
the building requires a national security clearance or permanent escort
by a person with such a clearance. But the State Department has no
record of having issued a national security clearance to Riza.

State Department officials believe that Riza was issued such a clearance
by the Defense Department after SAIC was forced by Wolfowitz and Feith
to hire her. Then her clearance would have been recognized by the State
Department through a credentials transmittal letter and Riza would have
accessed the State Department on Pentagon credentials, using her
Pentagon clearance to get a State Department building pass with a letter
issued under instructions from Liz Cheney.

But State Department officials tell me that no such letter can be
confirmed as received. And the officials stress that the department
would never issue a clearance to a non-U.S. citizen as part of a
contractual requisition. Issuing a national security clearance to a
foreign national under instructions from a Pentagon official would
constitute a violation of the executive orders governing clearances,
they say.

Given these circumstances, the inspector general of the Defense
Department should be ordered to investigate how Shaha Ali Riza was
issued a Pentagon security clearance. And the inspector general of the
State Department should investigate who ordered Riza's building pass and
whether there was a Pentagon credentials transmittal letter.

Wolfowitz's willful behavior, as though no rules bound him or facts
constrained his ideas, should not have surprised anyone. At the
Pentagon, Wolfowitz was an insistent force behind an invasion of Iraq,
bringing it up at the first National Security Council meeting of the
Bush administration, months before Sept. 11. For years he had been a
firm believer in the crackpot theories of Laurie Mylroie, a
neoconservative writer, who argued that Saddam was behind the 1993 World
Trade Center bombing and even the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. After
Sept. 11, Wolfowitz pursued his obsession by sending former CIA Director
James Woolsey on a secret mission to attempt to confirm the theory.
Woolsey came back with nothing, but Wolfowitz continued to believe. His
beliefs are stronger than any evidence.

Surrounded by his Praetorian Guard, Wolfowitz insulated himself at the
World Bank from the career staff. There, as at the Pentagon, Wolfowitz
pushed aside the professionals and replaced them with a small band of
politically reliable assistants. Wolfowitz rewarded them, too, on his
own authority, with enormous tax-free salaries. Consider Kevin Kellems,
his public affairs officer at the Pentagon, who had guided conservative
media from that perch and is known as "keeper of the comb," for having
been the person to hand Wolfowitz the infamous comb he licked before
slicking down his hair in the Michael Moore
<http://dir.salon.com/topics/michael_moore/> film "Fahrenheit 9/11."
Kellems was given a salary of $240,000, at least equal to what World
Bank vice presidents with years of service earn.

Wolfowitz had spent his career staging neoconservative insurgencies
against what he considered to be liberal establishments. But at the
World Bank he tried to model himself after Robert McNamara, who had
turned his presidency at the bank into his vehicle for redemption for
his part in the Vietnam War. Wolfowitz, the chief intellectual and
policy advocate for the Iraq war, no longer mentioned it. Now he pleads
to the World Bank board that his corrupt dealings be overlooked for the
greater good of his crusade against corruption. His refusal to resign
discredits and paralyzes the institution he had hoped would vindicate him.

--
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments