Why AIPAC Took Over Brookings - by Grant F. Smith
Why AIPAC Took Over Brookings - by Grant F. Smith
* The following is an excerpt from // Foreign Agents: The American
Israel Public Affairs Committee From the 1963 Fulbright Hearings to the
2005 Espionage Scandal
<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0976443775?ie=UTF8&tag=dissidentvoic-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=1789&creativeASIN=0976443775>//*
Martin Indyk, an Australian and naturalized US citizen, is the former
deputy director of research at the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee. Indyk helped establish the Washington Institute for Near East
Policy <http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateI01.php> (WINEP) in
1984 with the support of AIPAC board member and activist Barbi Weinberg.
Weinberg "had for over a decade privately wrestled with the idea of
creating a foreign policy center." ^1
<http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/why-aipac-took-over-brookings/#footnote_0_1159%23footnote_0_1159>
After the establishment of WINEP, Indyk stated that he was still
dissatisfied and wished to establish an institution capable of escaping
AIPAC's reputation as a "strongly biased organization."^ 1
<http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/why-aipac-took-over-brookings/#footnote_0_1159%23footnote_0_1159>
Indyk would later go on to found the Saban Center for Middle East Policy
at the Brookings Institution. The center was initially funded by a $13
million grant from Israeli dual citizen and television magnate Haim
Saban, ^2
<http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/why-aipac-took-over-brookings/#footnote_1_1159%23footnote_1_1159>
famously quoted by the //New York Times// as saying, "I'm a one-issue
guy and my issue is Israel."^ 3
<http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/why-aipac-took-over-brookings/#footnote_2_1159%23footnote_2_1159>
He also funded and established the Saban Institute for the Study of the
American Political System within the University of Tel Aviv.^ 4
<http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/why-aipac-took-over-brookings/#footnote_3_1159%23footnote_3_1159>
WINEP's role within the AIPAC power constellation is clear. While AIPAC
lobbies with brute force for yearly aid allocations and enforces
adherence to Israeli doctrine in Congress, WINEP polishes and shines
Israeli policy objectives as pure expressions of US foreign policy
interests. AIPAC is secretive about its internal deliberations and
activities, but the highly sociable WINEP cultivates the image of a
serious group of objective "scholars and wonks" deliberating Middle East
policies in a rigorously academic fashion. WINEP not only hosts
symposiums and conferences, but also conducts closed-door meetings with
US politicians and distributes books and other publications rich in
toned-down AIPAC ideology.
While AIPAC officials are loath to do live media events, especially with
call-in or other potentially interactive audience segments, WINEP
analysts and authors are omnipresent across major news- and
policy-oriented programs. However, media announcements rarely mention
WINEP's overlap with AIPAC and other members of the Israel lobby or its
close connections to Israel, although this would provide listeners and
viewers with useful context for understanding the organization's
sophisticated positions. WINEP is also a place for grooming future
presidential appointees, and it is perceived as a less controversial and
more credible stepping stone to power than AIPAC.
Although AIPAC does not list WINEP as an affiliate in its IRS filings,
in 2004 26% of AIPAC's board of directors were also trustees of WINEP.
^5
<http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/why-aipac-took-over-brookings/#footnote_4_1159%23footnote_4_1159>
* The following is an excerpt from // Foreign Agents: The American
Israel Public Affairs Committee From the 1963 Fulbright Hearings to the
2005 Espionage Scandal
<http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0976443775?ie=UTF8&tag=dissidentvoic-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=1789&creativeASIN=0976443775>//*
Martin Indyk, an Australian and naturalized US citizen, is the former
deputy director of research at the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee. Indyk helped establish the Washington Institute for Near East
Policy <http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateI01.php> (WINEP) in
1984 with the support of AIPAC board member and activist Barbi Weinberg.
Weinberg "had for over a decade privately wrestled with the idea of
creating a foreign policy center." ^1
<http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/why-aipac-took-over-brookings/#footnote_0_1159%23footnote_0_1159>
After the establishment of WINEP, Indyk stated that he was still
dissatisfied and wished to establish an institution capable of escaping
AIPAC's reputation as a "strongly biased organization."^ 1
<http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/why-aipac-took-over-brookings/#footnote_0_1159%23footnote_0_1159>
Indyk would later go on to found the Saban Center for Middle East Policy
at the Brookings Institution. The center was initially funded by a $13
million grant from Israeli dual citizen and television magnate Haim
Saban, ^2
<http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/why-aipac-took-over-brookings/#footnote_1_1159%23footnote_1_1159>
famously quoted by the //New York Times// as saying, "I'm a one-issue
guy and my issue is Israel."^ 3
<http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/why-aipac-took-over-brookings/#footnote_2_1159%23footnote_2_1159>
He also funded and established the Saban Institute for the Study of the
American Political System within the University of Tel Aviv.^ 4
<http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/why-aipac-took-over-brookings/#footnote_3_1159%23footnote_3_1159>
WINEP's role within the AIPAC power constellation is clear. While AIPAC
lobbies with brute force for yearly aid allocations and enforces
adherence to Israeli doctrine in Congress, WINEP polishes and shines
Israeli policy objectives as pure expressions of US foreign policy
interests. AIPAC is secretive about its internal deliberations and
activities, but the highly sociable WINEP cultivates the image of a
serious group of objective "scholars and wonks" deliberating Middle East
policies in a rigorously academic fashion. WINEP not only hosts
symposiums and conferences, but also conducts closed-door meetings with
US politicians and distributes books and other publications rich in
toned-down AIPAC ideology.
While AIPAC officials are loath to do live media events, especially with
call-in or other potentially interactive audience segments, WINEP
analysts and authors are omnipresent across major news- and
policy-oriented programs. However, media announcements rarely mention
WINEP's overlap with AIPAC and other members of the Israel lobby or its
close connections to Israel, although this would provide listeners and
viewers with useful context for understanding the organization's
sophisticated positions. WINEP is also a place for grooming future
presidential appointees, and it is perceived as a less controversial and
more credible stepping stone to power than AIPAC.
Although AIPAC does not list WINEP as an affiliate in its IRS filings,
in 2004 26% of AIPAC's board of directors were also trustees of WINEP.
^5
<http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/why-aipac-took-over-brookings/#footnote_4_1159%23footnote_4_1159>